Tradition vs Nation? DormaaHene Sparks Debate Over Flags and Unity

 In Ghana, symbols matter. They carry memory, identity, and authority. So when the DormaaHene openly questioned the growing habit of using non-national flags at public events, especially ceremonies attended by the President, it struck a nerve. His message was simple but firm: tradition is important, but national unity must never be blurred. In a time when symbols can quietly divide or unite, his call for standardization deserves serious attention.

The Concern Raised

The DormaaHene expressed clear displeasure over the increasing use of flags other than Ghana’s national flag by some traditional leaders during official functions. According to him, such practices create confusion about authority and representation, particularly when the Head of State is present. For a country built on shared history and collective struggle, the national flag remains the highest symbol of sovereignty.

His concern is not an attack on chieftaincy or cultural identity. Rather, it is a reminder that traditional authority and state authority must complement each other, not compete symbolically in public spaces.

Why the National Flag Matters

Ghana’s flag is more than fabric. It represents independence, unity, and the sacrifices made to build the nation. When it is sidelined at national or state-related events, it sends mixed signals, whether intentional or not. The DormaaHene’s position is that once an event involves the state, especially the President, the national flag should take clear precedence.

This is about clarity and respect. Citizens, especially young people watching these events, must clearly understand which symbol represents the collective nation and which represents local or traditional authority.

A Call for Standardization, Not Suppression

Importantly, the DormaaHene is not calling for the erasure of traditional symbols. His call is for standardization. There must be agreed rules on when and where certain flags are displayed. Traditional symbols have their rightful place, particularly in purely cultural or customary settings. But state occasions require a uniform approach that places national identity first.

Standardization removes ambiguity. It prevents unnecessary controversy and ensures that respect is evenly distributed across institutions.

Why This Conversation Matters Now

At a time when Ghana is navigating political tension, economic pressure, and growing public distrust in institutions, symbols become even more powerful. Small things, like flags, can quietly shape perceptions of unity or division. Addressing this now helps prevent deeper misunderstandings in the future.

The DormaaHene’s intervention should be seen as a patriotic reminder, not a confrontation.

Conclusion

The message is clear: Ghana comes first. Tradition strengthens the nation, but it must never overshadow it. By calling for clear standards on the use of flags at national events, the DormaaHene is pushing a conversation that goes beyond protocol. He is asking a deeper question about identity, respect, and unity. If symbols truly speak, then it is time Ghana speaks with one flag, one voice, and one clear sense of purpose.